Menu Content/Inhalt
Sports Home arrow Sports Home arrow Cricket arrow Cricket News arrow Hair in the Ointment for Pakistan

Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Syndicate

Related Items

Hair in the Ointment for Pakistan Print E-mail
Sunday, 20 August 2006
The bald facts do not tell the story. The 'facts' are that England won the fourth Test and therefore the series 3-0.

The crux is that Pakistan made a protest after umpires Darrell Hair and Billy Doctrove had implied that they had cheated by ball-tampering.

After the tea interval, and Pakistan failed to emerge the umpires removed the bails. When later on Pakistan came out, they were told it was pointless as the umpires would not be returning.

Confusion reigned. It was not until late into the evening that the authorities confirmed that there would be no cricket tomorrow and that ticket-holders would be refunded.

The authorities eventually made a statement, explaining why Pakistan had been deemed to have forfeited the Test:

" ... In accordance with the laws of cricket, it was noted that the umpires had correctly deemed that Pakistan had forfeited the match and awarded the Test to England.

"The Pakistan team was aggrieved by the award of five penalty runs to England.

"The award of those penalty runs for alleged interference with the ball is under review by the ICC match referee Mike Proctor, whose report will be considered in due course.

"ICC will be issuing a separate report concerning action which may be taken in relation to the forfeiture of the match by Pakistan."

Last Updated ( Sunday, 20 August 2006 )
 
< Prev   Next >